1.1 Following publication of the Phase Two Grenfell Tower Inquiry report in September 2024, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner wrote to all mayoral combined authorities, requesting that they work with regulators and key partners to prepare a local remediation acceleration plan. The purpose of this is to identify how the pace of remediation can be increased at a regional level and what support is needed to facilitate this.
1.2 In December 2024, the government published their Remediation Acceleration Plan policy paper and published an update in July 2025. This outlined three core objectives to deliver against:
1.3 The national RAP also sets out a series of clear metrics:
1.4 The Local Remediation Acceleration Plan is to consider the permanent remediation of all residential buildings over 11m in height. To date, remediation efforts have focused on buildings above 18m.
1.5 The following definitions from the Remediation Enforcement: Guidance for Regulators, published in December 2024, apply throughout this plan:
Remediation: the process of remedying fire and structural safety defects, including, but not limited to, external wall systems and their unsafe cladding and components. Successful remediation must bring unsafe buildings to a sustainably safe and liveable condition.
Permanent remediation: the remediated state in which no interim measures are required to protect life.
Sustainably safe: buildings that have been permanently remediated and therefore made safe – acknowledging that no building can be made ‘permanently safe’, as further issues may arise at any time.
Unsafe buildings: multi-occupied residential buildings over 11 metres in height or with at least 5 storeys, that need – or may need – remediation work or other mitigations to address fire and structural safety defects, including, but not limited to, unsafe cladding.
1.6 Under Building Regulations, combustible materials have been banned for use in external facades of buildings higher than 18m since 2018. Since June 2020, this ban has also applied to residential buildings between 11-18m in height. The Building Safety Act 2022 refers to building safety risks, including risks to the safety of people in or about a building arising from the spread of fire, structural failure or any other prescribed matter.
1.7 Local Authorities and Fire and Rescue services have previously worked intensively to identify buildings over 18m with cladding systems that require remediation. It is estimated that there were around 500 buildings across West Yorkshire that required assessment. As of the end of July 2025, there are 60 buildings in remediation programmes where work has not yet started (commenced on site).
1.8 Of the initial 60 buildings identified by MHCLG, WYFRS have already focused resources on the 23 high-rise buildings identified within that list. The work they have undertaken includes a full audit of each premises, resulting in the following outcomes, which directly relate to the remediation of EWS issues:
1.9 MHCLG has worked with Homes England to tackle the problem of unidentified buildings – predominantly 11-18m – with unsafe cladding. This has involved a review of Ordnance Survey data, which has resulted in a list that is expected to capture 80% of unsafe buildings. Based on data in July 2025, in West Yorkshire, there are currently an additional 69 buildings with potentially unsafe cladding that Homes England is seeking further information to decide if an application for remediation funding is needed or if a building can be ruled out as not requiring remediation. 157 buildings have been ruled out, and nine have progressed to an application within the Cladding Safety Scheme. This is discussed in more detail in Section 2.
1.10 It is important to note that the West Yorkshire Combined Authority have no statutory responsibilities regarding unsafe buildings.
1.11 Under the Building Safety Act 2022, building owners and landlords are responsible for making buildings safe.
1.12 All multi-occupied higher-risk residential buildings need a Fire Risk Assessment under Article 9 of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005; this should include an assessment of their external walls. If the assessment identifies a risk of an unsafe external wall system, then a Fire Risk Appraisal of the External Wall (FRAEW) is required to be carried out by a chartered fire engineer.
1.13 The West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service, using powers under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, conduct audits of buildings which may lead to the issuing of statutory and non-statutory notices to manage enforcement. These can be Action Plans, Fire Safety Matters Letters, Enforcement Notices and Prohibition Notices. Data relating to remediation progress and enforcement action against non-progress is reported to both the BSR and MHCLG.
1.14 Local authorities have a duty to keep housing conditions in their area under review. The Housing Act (2004) requires an assessment of hazards and the risk they pose to the health and safety of occupants and visitors. In addition, it is the function of local authorities to enforce building regulations and to check that building regulations are being complied with.
1.15 The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) is the Building Control Authority for higher-risk buildings of at least 18m in height. The BSR in England is part of the Health and Safety Executive and was set up under the Building Safety Act 2022. The BSR sets out rules to protect the design and construction of higher-risk buildings, working with other co-regulators as a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) approach to ensure the management of building safety risk.
1.16 The Regulator of Social Housing requires that Private registered providers (PRPs) and local authority registered providers (LARPs) submit data on the fire safety remediation of 11m plus buildings. The data relates to landlords’ obligations under the Fire Safety (Regulatory) Order 2005 for assessing fire safety risks associated with the relevant parts of those buildings; risks landlords have identified, particularly in relation to external wall systems (EWS) and whether landlords have plans in place to remediate buildings they have identified as having life critical fire safety risks in a timely manner.
1.17 The Cladding Safety Scheme CSS is managed by Homes England and provides funding for remediation works on residential buildings over 11m in height. Only the person or organisation legally responsible for a building’s external repair and maintenance can seek funding from the CSS.
1.18 In 2022, some leading developers signed a pledge to remediate life-critical fire safety works in buildings over 11m that they have played a role in developing or refurbishing over the last 30 years. Buildings where this applies are not eligible for the above CSS funding, as costs will be met by the developers themselves.
Driving and monitoring the progress of remediation (for example, by setting expectations and metrics)
2.1 The Combined Authority is expected to play a convening role, bringing together the key stakeholders in West Yorkshire with responsibilities relating to unsafe buildings identified above. To date, the West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service (WYFRS) have led on driving and monitoring the progress of remediation within buildings 18m+; this has been delivered alongside support from local authorities. WYFRS have utilised The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 as a key vehicle for supporting this work, with the principle of risk assessment used to guide the action taken. It also provides the quickest route to enforcement action, when necessary, to ensure the safety of buildings. WYFRS hold data on premises they have inspected, and action taken, and they periodically receive data on regional progress from MHCLG.
2.2 Local Authorities also have enforcement powers under the Housing Act 2004, and the Building Safety Regulator has powers under Part 4 of the Building Safety Act 2022 for higher-risk buildings. Under Part 5 of the Building Safety Act 2022, the Building Safety Regulator, local authorities, fire and rescue authorities, leaseholders, the Secretary of State, and others can apply for remediation orders and remediation contribution orders to compel relevant parties to fix, or pay to fix, their unsafe buildings. An explanation of these powers can be found in Annex A of the Remediation Enforcement Guidance.
2.3 To deliver these activities more effectively, this plan proposes to enhance the data gathered from the WYFRS, local authorities and other regulators, to be collated and actively shared so that further actions to speed up remediation can be identified.
2.4 There are many different reasons why work on unsafe buildings may stall. Homes England has identified five intervention categories for buildings within the cladding safety scheme:
Applicant behaviour – progress might stall due to reluctant applicants/freeholders.
Complexity - progress might stall due to building complexities such as location, multiple buildings, type of works, etc.
Policy issues - due to policy or external factors. This might include buildings that are not eligible for funding, for example, because they are under 11m, require internal works not associated with the external wall and Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW), or are student accommodation.
Low Capability - due to applicant capacity or capability, particularly for social housing landlords at a time when there are so many competing pressures - building safety and quality, damp and mould, decarbonisation and net zero, as well as delivery of new homes.
Sequence of Programme – works may be placed on hold because the applicant has indicated that the building(s) is/are part of a programme of remediation due to take place in the near/medium term. For social housing, this might include the time needed to decant tenants at a time when there is unprecedented demand for social housing.
2.5 Feedback from partners has also identified further concerns, including:
Approvals – Changing legislation since the Grenfell tragedy has resulted in some instances where design approaches have needed to change. Timescales for approvals through the Building Safety Regulator may have also contributed to some delays.
Industry Capacity – There may be limited contractor appetite for the levels of risk they must sign up to as legislation changes. Recruitment of specialist skill sets, especially in fire safety, is also causing delays to progress.
Lack of Capital resource – not all works are covered by a government funding programme, so establishing how these works are funded may contribute to delays.
2.6 The same approach to drive remediation work may not be appropriate for each building; however, consistency in monitoring will support more effective working. Working based on the above intervention categories, this plan proposes establishing a series of ‘pathways’ whereby the approach can be tailored to the circumstances of the buildings in question. This will reduce the risk of unrealistic expectations being set and will support effective monitoring. Alignment with the approach within the Cladding Safety Scheme will allow for consistent monitoring and reporting across the country.
2.7 The next steps will involve:
2.8 It is important to ensure that processes are not introduced for regulators that become burdensome and remove or direct focus away from activities that would normally be directed towards remediation. This would have an impact on the regulator's ability to support and push building owners towards that end goal and would therefore be counterproductive.
Assuring the safety of buildings awaiting or undergoing remediation (for example, by communicating with local regulators to coordinate action)
2.9 Section 3.2 outlines the governance arrangements for this plan and a structure for meetings that will support coordination. Regular communication, sharing of information and a detailed understanding of roles and responsibilities will be key to assuring the safety of buildings awaiting or undergoing remediation.
2.10 Further work is anticipated to align the work of regulators with the Remediation Enforcement: Guidance for Regulators, published in December 2024, and a task and finish group will be established to develop a memorandum of understanding. Further work is also needed to clarify and determine exactly what is expected of local authorities in practical terms, which can then become the standardised enforcement approach across all West Yorkshire Local Authorities.
Identifying additional buildings in need of remediation alongside government schemes
2.11 The Building Safety Act 2022 requires that all 18m+ buildings register with the Building Safety Regulator. This combined with the efforts of WYFRS and local authorities to inspect buildings over 18m provides some confidence that the vast majority of buildings over 18m that require remediation have been identified. Whilst buildings over 11m have been able to apply for funding since November 2022, there remain many buildings still to be identified and remediated.
2.12 To address this gap in information, Homes England has completed a national review of Ordnance Survey records that is expected to include 80% of buildings with unsafe cladding. They will continue to review further records to increase the number of buildings identified to an estimated 95% by the end of 2025. Buildings identified in this review as having potentially unsafe cladding have been added to a new National Remediation System and initially join a “pull in process,” where Homes England request verification of height and cladding from responsible entities.
2.13 The National Remediation System (NRS) is intended to facilitate effective collaboration on remediation. Initially, buildings that are progressing remediation through the Aluminium Composite Material remediation programme, the Building Safety Fund, the Responsible Actors Scheme or are being remediated directly by a Social Housing provider are not included in the system. Once the other schemes are brought into the programme, the National Remediation System is intended to act as a single source of information on buildings affected by cladding remediation.
2.14 Local authorities and fire services are being given access to the NRS following attendance of mandatory training on the use of the system run by Homes England. Partners are asked to:
2.15 A summary of the number of buildings currently identified (as of June 2025) through the ‘pull-in’ process is summarised in the table below. A ‘live’ status means further verification is needed before it is known whether a building does or does not have unsafe cladding. Buildings that have been ruled out have provided suitable evidence that they do not need to apply for the Cladding Safety Scheme or it is a duplicate record. This is not the total number of buildings still requiring remediation. There may be duplicates with buildings already in a scheme or additional buildings that are identified over time. The total numbers of buildings currently in programmes is included in Appendix 1.
Table: Buildings Identified through Homes England ‘pull-in’ process for missing buildings, July 2025.
| Local authority | Status: Live | Status: Ruled out | Progressed to application | ||||||
| 11-18m | 18m+ | Unk. | 11-18m | 18m+ | Unk. | 11-18m | 18m+ | Unk. | |
| Bradford | >20 | 1-5 | - | 11-20 | 6-10 | - | - | 1-5 | - |
| Calderdale | 1-5 | - | - | 6-10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kirklees | 11-20 | - | - | 6-10 | - | - | 1-5 | - | 1-5 |
| Leeds | 11-20 | 6-10 | - | >20 | 11-20 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 1-5 | - |
| Wakefield | 1-5 | 1-5 | - | >20 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Totals | 57 | 12 | - | 133 | 23 | 1-5 | 6-10 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
Taking action, including enforcement action, where voluntary remediation is not happening at a reasonable pace
2.16 WYFRS support the use of a risk assessment-based protocol for enforcement action. All buildings are required to have a fire risk assessment, and this should then identify where a building requires a Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW). Action plans are being used to support the findings of the FRAEW, and this provides the basis for enforcement action where necessary.
2.17 The remediation enforcement: guidance for regulators sets out the scope of work and the regulatory context for enforcement where remediation is not happening quickly enough. It sets out how a lead regulator should be established for each building and the tools available for enforcement.
2.18 To develop this further, a task and finish group will be established to set out a memorandum of understanding for regulators in West Yorkshire, to determine the approach that will be taken based on the circumstances in the region. On completion of this work, further detail will be provided in an update to this plan. This work is expected to be completed in January 2026.
How will you track buildings’ progress and how will you define ‘sufficient’ vs ‘insufficient’ progress toward remediation?
3.1 The national remediation acceleration plan has set out a series of national deadlines by which time remediation is expected to be complete. These are:
3.2 To ensure that all buildings meet this deadline, further milestones will need to be identified, to ensure buildings at risk of not meeting these deadlines are identified and appropriate action can be taken to secure progress. These may include:
3.3 Timescales for these milestones will be established with partners, including Homes England, and they will be assigned risk ratings to identify where delays may require further intervention, including enforcement action. These will be fully defined through a task and finish group that will be responsible for defining a series of ‘pathways’. They will be based on factors such as the building height and risk level, which programme they are working through, the type of responsible entity and the reasons for stalling. This will need to be aligned with the National Remediation System to ensure a consistent approach and to make the most efficient use of resources.
How will you track which interventions/actions increase progress and which don’t.
3.4 A tracker for each pathway and its associated milestones will be prepared. It is anticipated that it will be possible to monitor progress on each pathway and milestone and identify where particular pathways are not progressing in accordance with expected timescales.
How will you monitor regulators’ enforcement activity to ensure they are able to use their legal powers to increase the pace of remediation?
3.5 The meeting schedules outlined in section 3.2 will provide opportunity to monitor what enforcement activity is taking place and this will provide a forum to ensure that the system to identify a lead regulator is working effectively. Enforcement activity will be mapped along with the remediation ‘pathways’ so that it can be identified where particular approaches may need to be reviewed.
Would it be possible and/or beneficial for Combined Authorities to set timescales for regulators to complete different strands of activity?
3.6 As part of the pathways proposal, timescales will be identified to meet certain milestones, however it is not considered appropriate for these to be set by the Combined Authority and rather led by the regulators in collaboration with the Combined Authority. There are circumstances where the setting of timescales maybe be unrealistic or even counterproductive and this will need to be explored as the pathways are defined.
What toolkit of interventions will be used?
3.7 Interventions are currently managed mainly through the West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service, using powers under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. These include issuing statutory and non-statutory notices such as Action Plans / Fire Safety Matters Letter / Enforcement Notice and Prohibition Notice. The principle around the FSO is Risk Assessment. Therefore, any action taken should be in line with the principles of the FSO and risk assessment. WYFRS have developed a set process internally to deal with those premises not progressing. This links in with the requirement for buildings to have a Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW) carried out by a chartered fire engineer.
3.8 Local Authorities also have enforcement powers under the Housing Act 2004, and the Building Safety Regulator has powers under Part 4 of the Building Safety Act 2022 for higher risk buildings. Under Part 5 of the Building Safety Act 2022, the Building Safety Regulator, local authorities, fire and rescue authorities, leaseholders, the Secretary of State, and others can apply for remediation orders and remediation contribution orders to compel relevant parties to fix, or pay to fix, their unsafe buildings. An explanation of these powers can be found in Annex A of the Remediation Enforcement Guidance.
3.9 In accordance with the remediation enforcement: guidance for regulators, a memorandum of understanding will be developed to assist local regulators to identify a lead regulator, and how the different regulators will work together to speed up enforcement.
How will building or entity action plans be used?
3.10 Action plans are put in place to align with the recommendations within a building’s FRAEW, and they provide a basis upon which enforcement action can be taken, if required.
How would you like to work with other parties, including regulators (and including the Building Safety Regulator (BSR)) – to assure the safety of buildings awaiting or undergoing remediation?
3.11 The Combined Authority holds no statutory powers and is therefore reliant on the cooperation and capacity of the regulators to take a role in assuring the safety of buildings. Regulators will need to provide a regional point of contact for West Yorkshire, regularly share relevant information with the combined authority, and participate in coordination meetings to ensure information is shared effectively and actions are carried out.
3.12 WYFRS have developed (as have all FRS's) a BSR team. This incorporates a BSR Regional Manager who covers West/North/South Yorkshire and Humberside. This role supports the regional FRS’s in working with the BSR.
How will you support local regulators to coordinate and maximise their activity?
3.13 Much of the focus of current work is on Leeds city centre, as the area with the highest concentration of buildings over 18m. However, as more buildings between 11-18m are identified, more work may be required in other local authority areas, with a greater role for local authority building control and Environmental Health as these do not come under the remit of the Building Safety Regulator. The following options will be explored and tested with partners:
How will you monitor to ensure it is working well?
3.14 The Combined Authority propose establishing regular monitoring cycles, aligned with update meetings, where regulators will be able to share any challenges relating to coordinating intervention activity.
3.15 The governance structures that have been established will provide opportunities for buildings that aren’t progressing quickly enough to be escalated to the appropriate level. Opportunities to provide feedback on what is or is not working well will be provided.
3.16 The WYRAP will be reviewed annually to incorporate learning and updates to systems and processes where required. The next update will take place in Autumn 2026.
How will you raise to the ministry buildings that are not progressing to remediation quickly enough?
3.17 Regular meetings will follow the structure set out in section 3.2. One to one meetings between MHCLG and the combined authority will provide a forum to raise specific issues around buildings that are not progressing in line with the pathways and milestones identified.
3.18 Regulators will have the opportunity to escalate buildings where regional efforts are not proving effective through the NRS and, where required, through monthly meetings with MHCLG.
How and how often will you share data with the ministry?
3.19 Data will be shared with MHCLG every three months, with informal updates monthly. This is intended to ensure a balance is struck between regular updates and officer time expended, whilst ensuring that any urgent or high priority issues can be raised quickly.
How and how often will you engage with regulators?
3.20 Working group meetings including local authorities and the fire and rescue service are anticipated to happen monthly, with a leadership update quarterly. Other regulators, including the BSR and Regulator of Social Housing will also be invited to attend these meetings when required.
How will you use the levers available to you to support regulators to increase the pace of their remediation work?
3.21 The main role of the combined authority is to use its convening powers to bring regulators together, share learning and intelligence and provide support through bringing insight from other areas, and relieving some of the burden in relation to data sharing and monitoring. The Combined Authority will also be an advocate and champion for local authorities, ensuring appropriate levels of funding and policy clarity with government.
3.22 Any remediation work on high rise properties can be disruptive to those living in their homes. Unfortunately to remediate those homes these works are essential to be undertaken but should be managed in such a way as to minimise the impact on all those affected.
3.23 It is essential that all residents are put at the heart of the process and are kept informed of what is happening, when works will be expected to start and finish, and who to contact if they have any issues during those works. Residents should know what to expect and how it will affect them.
3.24 To support residents the Government has produced a Code of Practice for the remediation of residential buildings which details the communications that residents should expect from those responsible for delivering and overseeing the works such as the landlord, freeholders, construction company and developers.
3.25 The guidance provides clear expectations for those involved on how to engage with residents during the process as well as to identify, assess and manage the impacts of remediation works on residents’ lives, such as noise, dust, disruption, access, security and health.
3.26 The following links provide further information for residents:
Cladding Safety Scheme – Information for leaseholders and residents - GOV.UK
Building Safety Fund Leaseholder and Resident Service - GOV.UK
Cladding and other fire safety works – information for residents - GOV.UK
3.27 Leaseholders are also able to access independent advice on leaseholder rights through the Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE). They can support leaseholders who have concerns about unsafe cladding or fire safety works. Find out more on the LEASE website.
3.28 Residents with concerns about the safety of the cladding on their buildings can contact Homes England using their ‘tell us tool’. Tell Homes England about unsafe cladding on a building - GOV.UK
3.29 Where regulators are engaging with building owners or responsible entities, they will be signposted to the code of practice to encourage them to ensure they are complying with the guidance.
3.30 Any engagement with residents will also include signposting so they are fully aware of what to expect and where they can seek further information and assistance.
How will you facilitate data sharing between regulators?
3.31 The Combined Authority, each local authority and the WYFRS are all signatories of the inter-agency information sharing protocol and have agreed to keep any information shared confidential and secure. No personal information is to be shared, and the information relates to the safety of buildings with authorities who have a responsibility to support the safety of those identified premises. The Combined Authority are exploring the option of establishing a SharePoint site for the purpose of receiving and sharing data. Any data supplied to the Combined Authority will be collated and cross-checked to ensure consistency and avoid missing or duplicated information.
3.32 Ultimately, the National Remediation system will provide a platform for sharing information across organisations at a building level.
How will you use data to assess whether the pace of remediation is increasing as a result of regulators’ activities?
3.33 To assess whether the pace of remediation is increasing, it will be necessary to establish a baseline for the pace of remediation, monitoring how quickly buildings are passing through identified milestones and the reasons why progress may have been fast or slow. It may take some time to establish those baselines, depending on what existing data is available. Data from MHCLG and the National Remediation System will be used alongside information from the Fire and Rescue Service and Local Authorities.
3.34 Once the pathways are defined and established, it is hoped it will be possible to identify trends in timescales, however this will also depend on the number of buildings included on each pathway.
How will you record and keep track of building progress?
3.35 A tracker will be established to monitor building progress, and regulators will be asked to provide regular updates so the data can be kept up to date.
This section describes the resources and funding needed to deliver the local remediation acceleration plan, and the governance that will be established.
Describe the resources, including staffing, you will require to deliver the activities and objectives set out in your plan
4.1 The West Yorkshire Combined Authority has recruited a policy manager to lead on remediation on behalf of the combined authority. They will be supported by a policy coordinator and a GIS analyst. This team sits within the Place and Environment Policy service in the Policing, Environment and Place Directorate.
4.2 This team is responsible for:
4.3 Work is underway to map capacity across the West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue service and Local authorities, so an understanding can be built of what further capacity is needed to help speed up remediation. The WYFRS require an administrator or data analyst to extract the information held within their systems to be able to address the needs of this plan. In the longer term, there will be a need for further inspection resources, depending on the scale of the task in relation to buildings between 11-18m, alongside other emerging significant legislative pressures such as the Renters Rights Bill, alongside current workloads and capacity.
4.4 Some Local Authorities have received new burdens funding, and this is primarily being spent on increased capacity in Environmental health teams. Longer term funding is needed to allow Local Authorities to plan effectively.
4.5 Industry capacity for fire inspectors, building control inspectors and environmental health officers remains a challenge; training for inspectors takes three years so building further capacity in the fire service and local authorities may take some time. Further support from government to deal with this shortage of expertise would be welcomed.
Describe the governance plans you will put in place to ensure this plan is being delivered effectively.
4.6 A working group has been established, and regular monthly meetings have been set up to support the development of the WYRAP. These meetings are attended by each local authority and the WYFRS, and are chaired by the combined authority. They provide a space to share information, develop understanding of the specific requirements within each organisation and coordinate work across the region as the WYRAP is developed and implemented. This is supported by a leadership group that provides oversight and decision making to the working group on a quarterly basis.
4.7 In the Devolution White paper, published in December 2024, it was established that mayors of strategic authorities will eventually take on accountability for the exercise of fire and rescue authority functions. Until such time, there is no present forum that includes both the mayor and the fire service. In order to provide political oversight, the fire service will therefore be invited to an existing meeting within the combined authority structure in the interim.
4.8 Task and finish groups will be identified as required with the working group to progress specific tasks. Two initial task and finish groups have been identified which will work on establishing a memorandum of understanding for West Yorkshire and developing the proposed pathways. Monthly one-to-one meetings are also in place so local authorities can review information specific to their area with the combined authority and the fire service as required.
4.9 There are also a series of meetings led and coordinated by MHCLG, including quarterly mayoral roundtables, quarterly officials’ roundtables for all MSA’s and one-to-one meetings with combined authorities. It is anticipated that these will evolve once all LRAP’s are in place across the country.
4.10 The diagram below outlines the proposed meetings and how they interrelate.
4.11 Further work is required to ensure suitable coordination with the Building Safety Regulator, Homes England and the Regulator of Social housing, which may involve inviting representatives to meetings on an ad-hoc basis, depending on the agenda and identified priorities.
This table provides a summary of buildings within each funding programme as of July 2025 – Aluminium Composite material remediation programme (ACM), Building Safety Fund (BSF), Cladding Safety Scheme (CSS), Responsible Actors Scheme (Developer) or social housing (Social).
| Location | Scheme | Number of buildings | % in programme | % underway | % complete | Buildings of interest (ACM/BSF only) | Buildings in interim measures |
| Bradford | ACM | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | ||
| BSF | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | |||
| CSS | 1-5 | 100% | 0% | 0% | |||
| Social | 11-20 | 100% | 0% | 0% | |||
| Total | 11-20 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 1-5 | 6-10 | |
| Calderdale | ACM | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | ||
| BSF | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | |||
| CSS | 1-5 | 100% | 0% | 0% | |||
| Social | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | |||
| Total | 6-10 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1-5 | 1-5 | |
| Kirklees | ACM | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | ||
| CSS | 1-5 | 100% | 0% | 0% | |||
| Social | 11-20 | 92% | 8% | 0% | |||
| Total | 11-20 | 78% | 6% | 17% | 11-20 | Over 20 | |
| Leeds | ACM | 11-20 | 0% | 9% | 91% | ||
| BSF | Over 20 | 11% | 41% | 48% | |||
| CSS | 11-20 | 79% | 16% | 5% | |||
| Developer | 11-20 | 50% | 36% | 14% | |||
| Social | 1-5 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |||
| Total | Over 20 | 36% | 26% | 36% | 11-20 | Over 20 | |
| Wakefield | BSF | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | ||
| CSS | 1-5 | 100% | 0% | 0% | |||
| Developer | 1-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% | |||
| Social | 1-5 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |||
| Total | 6-10 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1-5 | 1-5 | |
| West Yorkshire | Total | 125 | 48% | 19% | 33% |
